NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 versus 26668
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 versus 1060
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 versus 191142
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 versus 33398
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 versus 33398
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 versus 26668 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 versus 1060 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 versus 191142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 versus 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 versus 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3354 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 4% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 556.0 GTexel/s versus 532.8 GTexel/s
- Environ 3% de pipelines plus haut: 10496 versus 10240
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 12 GB
- Environ 3% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 versus 485.179
- 11.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 661.977
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 versus 60.472
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 versus 129.036
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5118 versus 5077
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s versus 532.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 versus 10240 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 12 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 versus 485.179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 versus 661.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 versus 60.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 versus 129.036 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 versus 2441.001 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 versus 5077 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 | 26668 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 | 1060 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 191142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 | 690.619 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 7585.258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 | 62.614 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 209.424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 | 2441.384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 | 5118 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA102 | GA102 |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1199 | $1499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 60 | 46 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10240 | 10496 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 186.5 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 532.8 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | Triple-slot |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 912.4 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 384 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
