NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 vs 26668
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 1060
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 191142
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 33398
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 33398
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 31 May 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 vs 26668 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 vs 1060 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 191142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3354 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Etwa 2% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1395 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Etwa 2% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 4% höhere Texturfüllrate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 532.8 GTexel/s
- Etwa 3% höhere Leitungssysteme: 10496 vs 10240
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Etwa 3% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 485.179
- 11.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 661.977
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 60.472
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 129.036
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5118 vs 5077
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1395 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 532.8 GTexel/s |
| Leitungssysteme | 10496 vs 10240 |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 vs 485.179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 661.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 vs 60.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 vs 129.036 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 2441.001 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 vs 5077 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 | 26668 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 | 1060 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 191142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 | 690.619 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 7585.258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 | 62.614 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 209.424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 | 2441.384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 33398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 | 5118 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
| Codename | GA102 | GA102 |
| Startdatum | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1199 | $1499 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 60 | 46 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1365 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
| Leitungssysteme | 10240 | 10496 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 186.5 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| Texturfüllrate | 532.8 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 350 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
| Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Länge | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 750 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | Triple-slot |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 912.4 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 384 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
