NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB versus AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and AMD Radeon RX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 2190 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- 2x plus de vitesse augmenté: 2430 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz
- Environ 95% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 311.0 GTexel/s versus 159.23 GTexel/s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 4352 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 4 nm versus 14 nm
- 3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 129915 versus 36107
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 versus 626
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22739 versus 6967
- 3.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2913 versus 880
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 474.547 versus 105.688
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.491 versus 8.251
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.736 versus 79.029
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1830.143 versus 520.089
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2023 versus 18 April 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2190 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2430 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 311.0 GTexel/s versus 159.23 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4352 versus 2048 |
| Processus de fabrication | 4 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129915 versus 36107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 versus 626 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22739 versus 6967 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2913 versus 880 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 versus 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 versus 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 versus 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 versus 520.089 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- Environ 47% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 220 Watt
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 220 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129915 | 36107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 | 626 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22739 | 6967 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2913 | 880 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 | 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 | 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 | 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 | 520.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 1083.926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | AD106 | Polaris 20 |
| Date de sortie | 2023 | 18 April 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 72 | 405 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2430 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2190 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 330.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4352 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 155.5 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 311.0 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Embedded
