NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and AMD Radeon RX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 2190 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- 2x more boost clock speed: 2430 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
- Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 311.0 GTexel/s vs 159.23 GTexel/s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 4352 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 129915 vs 36107
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 626
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22739 vs 6967
- 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2913 vs 880
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 474.547 vs 105.688
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.491 vs 8.251
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.736 vs 79.029
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1830.143 vs 520.089
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 2190 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 311.0 GTexel/s vs 159.23 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4352 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129915 vs 36107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 vs 626 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22739 vs 6967 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2913 vs 880 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 vs 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 vs 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 vs 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 vs 520.089 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129915 | 36107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 | 626 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22739 | 6967 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2913 | 880 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 | 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 | 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 | 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 | 520.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 1083.926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | AD106 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 72 | 405 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Price now | $149.99 | |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2190 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 330.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4352 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 155.5 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 311.0 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Embedded
