NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 2190 MHz versus 1607 MHz
- Environ 40% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2430 MHz versus 1733 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 311.0 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s
- Environ 70% de pipelines plus haut: 4352 versus 2560
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 4 nm versus 16 nm
- 225x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective versus 10 GB/s
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 129915 versus 55548
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 versus 887
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22739 versus 15578
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2913 versus 1560
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 474.547 versus 150.103
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.491 versus 14.035
- 7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.736 versus 27.417
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1830.143 versus 819.934
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2023 versus 27 May 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2190 MHz versus 1607 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2430 MHz versus 1733 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 311.0 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4352 versus 2560 |
| Processus de fabrication | 4 nm versus 16 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective versus 10 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129915 versus 55548 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 versus 887 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22739 versus 15578 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2913 versus 1560 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 versus 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 versus 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 versus 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 versus 819.934 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 220 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129915 | 55548 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 | 887 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22739 | 15578 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2913 | 1560 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 | 819.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 2036.763 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Nom de code | AD106 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 2023 | 27 May 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 72 | 281 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2430 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2190 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 4 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 330.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4352 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 155.5 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 311.0 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 10 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Embedded
