NVIDIA Quadro K4100M versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 77% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 706 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 67.78 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 57.6x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 20
- 32.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,627 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 4.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2772 versus 630
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 versus 314
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8831 versus 3210
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.487 versus 8.844
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.985 versus 171.17
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.281 versus 1.115
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.452 versus 10.385
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 61.984 versus 12.361
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1105 versus 988
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 versus 1702
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3246 versus 2808
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1105 versus 988
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 versus 1702
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3246 versus 2808
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 3 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.78 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,627 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2772 versus 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 versus 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8831 versus 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 versus 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 versus 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1105 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 versus 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1105 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 versus 2808 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 100 Watt
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2772 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8831 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1105 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1105 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | GK104 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 3 June 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1074 | 1359 |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz | 400 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,627 gflops | 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.78 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 392 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 102.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
Quick Sync |