NVIDIA Quadro K420 versus NVIDIA Quadro 410
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K420 and NVIDIA Quadro 410 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K420
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 876 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 24% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 14.02 GTexel / s versus 11.3 GTexel / s
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 336.4 gflops versus 271.1 gflops
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 versus 438
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 versus 219
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1847 versus 1446
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6 versus 5.393
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 186.605 versus 126.006
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.365 versus 5.685
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.75 versus 8.847
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1245 versus 919
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1245 versus 919
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 7 August 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 876 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.02 GTexel / s versus 11.3 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 336.4 gflops versus 271.1 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 versus 438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 versus 219 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1847 versus 1446 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6 versus 5.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 versus 126.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.365 versus 5.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.75 versus 8.847 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 versus 919 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 versus 919 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 410
- Environ 8% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 38 Watt versus 41 Watt
- 512x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 512 MB versus 1 GB / 2 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1311 versus 598
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1794 versus 1241
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1311 versus 598
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1794 versus 1241
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt versus 41 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 512 MB versus 1 GB / 2 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1311 versus 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1794 versus 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1311 versus 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1794 versus 1241 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K420
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 410
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA Quadro 410 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 | 438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 | 219 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1847 | 1446 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6 | 5.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 | 126.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.433 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.365 | 5.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.75 | 8.847 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 | 919 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 598 | 1311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1241 | 1794 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 | 919 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 598 | 1311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1241 | 1794 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA Quadro 410 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK107 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 7 August 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $96.67 | $149 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1457 | 1460 |
Prix maintenant | $89.99 | $272.28 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.27 | 1.70 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 876 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 336.4 gflops | 271.1 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.02 GTexel / s | 11.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 38 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 160 mm | 176 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB / 2 GB | 512 MB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | DDR3 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.26 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |