NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1093 MHz versus 954 MHz
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.821 versus 34.42
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.297 versus 776.776
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.966 versus 36.688
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.204 versus 82.511
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 versus 4501
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 versus 4501
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 January 2017 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1093 MHz versus 954 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 versus 34.42 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 versus 776.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 versus 36.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 versus 82.511 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 versus 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 versus 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 127.1 GTexel / s versus 43.72 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,050 gflops versus 1,399 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 versus 3230
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 versus 317
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 versus 10582
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.915 versus 3.631
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 2645
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 2645
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s versus 43.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops versus 1,399 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 versus 3230 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 versus 317 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 versus 10582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.915 versus 3.631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 2645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 2645 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3230 | 3818 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 317 | 333 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | 15023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | 34.42 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | 776.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 3.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | 36.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | 82.511 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 11 January 2017 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 784 | 786 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1093 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,399 gflops | 3,050 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.72 GTexel / s | 127.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 380 XGL
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
ATIFireGL V7100
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5000
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
