NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 954 MHz
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 122 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.821 vs 46.273
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.297 vs 777.677
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.966 vs 38.196
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.204 vs 82.511
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 vs 4501
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 vs 4501

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 vs 3242
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 vs 318
• Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 10582
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 vs 3.631
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2645
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2645

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3818
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	318 333
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10582 15023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.821 46.273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	793.297 777.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.631 3.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.966 38.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.204 82.511
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4941 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2645 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4941 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2645 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3356

Compare specifications (specs)