NVIDIA Quadro P1000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 47 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 596 versus 559
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 versus 49.824
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 versus 44.06
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 versus 103.884
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 versus 559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 versus 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 versus 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 versus 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 134 billion / sec versus 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 512
- Environ 76% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 1,894 gflops
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7012 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5912 versus 4464
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17944 versus 15667
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 versus 832.248
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.899 versus 4.039
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 versus 6796
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 versus 6796
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2136 versus 1591
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec versus 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 1,894 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5912 versus 4464 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17944 versus 15667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 versus 832.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 versus 4.039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 versus 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 versus 6796 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2136 versus 1591 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4464 | 5912 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 559 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 17944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 | 2136 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 30 May 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $375 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 530 | 532 |
| Prix maintenant | $319.99 | $449.99 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.53 | 15.45 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops | 3,333 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 GTexel / s | 134 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 224.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P1000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDFirePro M6000
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
