NVIDIA Quadro P1000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 1127 MHz
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 47 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 716x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 versus 792.44
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 versus 35.338
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 versus 200.825
- 10.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 versus 157
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 versus 22 January 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 1127 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 versus 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 versus 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 versus 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 versus 157 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Environ 22% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 72 billion / sec versus 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 512
- Environ 27% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,413 gflops versus 1,894 gflops
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6100 versus 4479
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 versus 590
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18663 versus 15667
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 versus 71.86
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 versus 4.039
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 versus 6796
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 versus 6796
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 72 billion / sec versus 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops versus 1,894 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6100 versus 4479 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 versus 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18663 versus 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 versus 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 versus 4.039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 versus 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 versus 6796 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4479 | 6100 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 18663 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 73.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 | 157 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP107 | GM206 |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 22 January 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $375 | $199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 523 | 524 |
Prix maintenant | $319.99 | $229.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.53 | 34.63 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 1127 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops | 2,413 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 GTexel / s | 72 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 2,940 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pins |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Options SLI | 2x | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |