NVIDIA Quadro P1000 versus NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Tesla P40 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 5.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 47 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 versus 439
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 versus 13 September 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 versus 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1303 MHz versus 1266 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1531 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 367.4 GTexel / s versus 59.2 GTexel / s
- 7.5x plus de pipelines: 3840 versus 512
- 6.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,758 gflops versus 1,894 gflops
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 4 GB
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10008 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12267 versus 4500
- 4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62287 versus 15667
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 versus 71.86
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 versus 832.248
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.757 versus 4.039
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 versus 65.117
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1214.142 versus 245.081
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9538 versus 6796
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9538 versus 6796
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1303 MHz versus 1266 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1531 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 367.4 GTexel / s versus 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 11,758 gflops versus 1,894 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10008 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12267 versus 4500 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62287 versus 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 versus 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 versus 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 versus 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 versus 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 versus 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9538 versus 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9538 versus 6796 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | 12267 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 439 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 62287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 204.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP107 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 13 September 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $375 | $5,699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 517 | 234 |
Prix maintenant | $319.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops | 11,758 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 3840 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 GTexel / s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 11,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 24 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 480.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |