NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 1228 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 versus 2433
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 442
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 versus 9864
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 versus 36.898
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 versus 170.785
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 versus 1.373
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 18.937
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 versus 160.823
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 3684
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 3331
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 3684
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 3331
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 17 May 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 1228 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 versus 2433 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 versus 9864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 versus 36.898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 versus 170.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 versus 1.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 18.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 versus 160.823 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 3331 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1354 MHz
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 40 Watt
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 3575
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 3575
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1354 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 3575 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 2433 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 9864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 36.898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 170.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 1.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 18.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 160.823 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3331 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP107 | N17P-G1 |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 17 May 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 874 |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | $59.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | 63.91 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12_1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |