NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1920
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 499 versus 412
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11023 versus 9715
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 6 January 2019 |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1920 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 499 versus 412 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11023 versus 9715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15485 versus 14496
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15485 versus 14496
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64091 versus 63810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15485 versus 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15485 versus 14496 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 499 | 412 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11023 | 9715 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63810 | 64091 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 15485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 15485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 234.866 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2849.031 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.956 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 147.291 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 809.639 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | N19E-Q1 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 6 January 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 244 | 243 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1380 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 945 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 10800 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Taille du laptop | Large | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
