NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 200 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 200 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Environ 69% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 780 - 960 MHz
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1380 - 1485 MHz
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 versus 566
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16059 versus 12794
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 18169
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 18169
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 68858
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 780 - 960 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1380 - 1485 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 versus 566 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16059 versus 12794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 18169 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 18169 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3716 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 68858 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 749 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 16059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 | 105171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 182 | 154 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 780 - 960 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
