NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 versus AMD FirePro W9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and AMD FirePro W9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 74% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 930 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 750 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16063 versus 7987
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 43046
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 versus 106.585
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 versus 1878.403
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 versus 9.751
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.544 versus 82.208
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1106.12 versus 511.115
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 9143
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 9143
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 26 March 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 930 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 750 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16063 versus 7987 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 versus 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 versus 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 versus 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 versus 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 versus 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 9143 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9100
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 versus 3719
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 versus 3358
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 versus 3719
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 versus 3358
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 versus 749 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD FirePro W9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16063 | 7987 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 32085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 32085 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | TU104 | Hawaii |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 26 March 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 154 | 189 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz | 930 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 750 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 6,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,238 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2816 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 163.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 275 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 512 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |