NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 930 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 750 Watt
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16063 vs 7987
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 43046
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 vs 106.585
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 1878.403
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 vs 9.751
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.544 vs 82.208
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1106.12 vs 511.115
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 9143
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 9143

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3719
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3358
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3719
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16063 7987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	749 752
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	105171 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	226.447 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4161.764 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.476 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.544 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1106.12 511.115
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 32085

Compare specifications (specs)