NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 versus AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD Radeon Pro SSG pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 7.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 10972
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 588
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 170.923
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 3178.443
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 16.732
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 173.59
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1231.051
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 11029
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 11029
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 8 August 2017 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 10972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 170.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 3178.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 16.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 173.59 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1231.051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 11029 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1500 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 versus 3652
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 versus 3652
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 versus 3652 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | 10972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | 588 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 170.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 3178.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 16.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 173.59 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 1231.051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | TU102 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 8 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | $6,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 103 | 158 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 |