NVIDIA Quadro T1000 versus AMD Radeon RX 480
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD Radeon RX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1120 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1455 MHz versus 1266 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 69.84 GTexel/s versus 182.3 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 29 June 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1120 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz versus 1266 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.84 GTexel/s versus 182.3 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480
- 3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 768
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8629 versus 6597
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 778 versus 420
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39118 versus 32981
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 versus 87.83
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 versus 9009
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 versus 9009
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 768 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8629 versus 6597 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 versus 420 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39118 versus 32981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 versus 87.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 versus 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 versus 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6597 | 8629 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 | 778 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 39118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 103.851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 11172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 11172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4162 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD Radeon RX 480 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | TU117 | Ellesmere |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 29 June 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 391 | 340 |
| Genre | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz | 1266 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1120 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.84 GTexel/s | 182.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 5,700 million |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5.8 TFLOPs | |
| GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | n / a | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
