NVIDIA Quadro T1000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 215 Watt
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1395 MHz
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- 3.8x plus de pipelines: 2944 versus 768
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 8000 MHz
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18811 versus 6599
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 versus 420
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 versus 32981
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 versus 87.83
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 9009
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3718
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3359
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 9009
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3718
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3359
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1395 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
Pipelines | 2944 versus 768 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 8000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18811 versus 6599 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 versus 420 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 versus 32981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 versus 87.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6599 | 18811 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 | 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 102535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 326.494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 6293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10965 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU117 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 391 | 97 |
Genre | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.84 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |