NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5500M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- 4.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 85 Watt
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7775 versus 6786
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 40073 versus 37186
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 versus 105.82
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 versus 1860.146
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 versus 94.947
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 versus 596.819
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 versus 9175
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 versus 9175
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 85 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7775 versus 6786 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40073 versus 37186 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 versus 105.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 versus 1860.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 versus 94.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 versus 596.819 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 versus 9175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 versus 9175 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 124.8 GTexel/s versus 91.20 GTexel/s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 9.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 versus 476
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 versus 10.833
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 2238
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.8 GTexel/s versus 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1024 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 versus 476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 versus 10.833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7775 | 6786 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 659 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40073 | 37186 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 105.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 1860.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 11.238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 94.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 596.819 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 9175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 9175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Nom de code | TU117 | Navi 14 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 357 | 353 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
| Date de sortie | 13 Nov 2019 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 41.60 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 124.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 6400 million |
| Unités de Compute | 24 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
ATIFireGL V7700
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580X
