NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA RTX A4000

versus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
Environ 4% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 5888
Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 220 Watt
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 versus 999
Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 1664.554

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	12 Apr 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020
Pipelines	6144 versus 5888
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	140 Watt versus 220 Watt
Taille de mémore maximale	16 GB versus 8 GB
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	1026 versus 999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1895.111 versus 1664.554

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 735 MHz
Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1560 MHz
Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 299.5 GTexel/s
Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 19545
Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 121768
Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 420.465
Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 4156.52
Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 32.297
Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 162.131
Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 22050
3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3715
9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3355
Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 22050
3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3715
9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3355
Environ 21% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 2604

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1500 MHz versus 735 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz versus 1560 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	317.4 GTexel/s versus 299.5 GTexel/s
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	22253 versus 19545
Geekbench - OpenCL	123479 versus 121768
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	453.922 versus 420.465
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	5803.174 versus 4156.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	40.757 versus 32.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	182.055 versus 162.131
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	31716 versus 22050
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	13566 versus 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	31930 versus 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	31716 versus 22050
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	13566 versus 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	31930 versus 3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3163 versus 2604

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

19545

22253

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1026

999

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

121768

123479

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

420.465

453.922

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4156.52

5803.174

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

32.297

40.757

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

162.131

182.055

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1895.111

1664.554

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

22050

31716

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

13566

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

31930

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

22050

31716

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

13566

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

31930

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2604

3163

Nom	NVIDIA RTX A4000	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark	19545	22253
PassMark - G2D Mark	1026	999
Geekbench - OpenCL	121768	123479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	420.465	453.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4156.52	5803.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	32.297	40.757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	162.131	182.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1895.111	1664.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	22050	31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	31930
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	22050	31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	31930
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2604	3163

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA RTX A4000	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Essentiel
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Nom de code	GA104	GA104
Date de sortie	12 Apr 2021	1 Sep 2020
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	108	44
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$499
Genre		Desktop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1560 MHz	1725 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	735 MHz	1500 MHz
Processus de fabrication	8 nm	8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	599.0 GFLOPS (1:32)	317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	19.17 TFLOPS (1:1)	20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	19.17 TFLOPS	20.31 TFLOPS
Pipelines	6144	5888
Pixel fill rate	149.8 GPixel/s	165.6 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	299.5 GTexel/s	317.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	140 Watt	220 Watt
Compte de transistor	17400 million	17400 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Facteur de forme	Single-slot	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Longeur	241 mm (9.5 inches)	242 mm, 9.5 inches
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	300 Watt	550 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 6-pin	1x 12-pin
Largeur	112 mm (4.4 inches)	112 mm, 4.4 inches
Hauteur		112 mm (4.4 inches)
Soutien API
DirectX	12.2	12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	16 GB	8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	448 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 bit	256 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	GDDR6