NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 299.5 GTexel/s versus 59.2 GTexel / s
- 12x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 512
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- 4.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 versus 4500
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 versus 590
- 7.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 versus 15667
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 71.86
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 versus 832.248
- 8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 versus 4.039
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 65.117
- 7.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 245.081
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 6796
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 6796
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2604 versus 1591
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 7 February 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s versus 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 512 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 versus 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 versus 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 versus 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 versus 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 versus 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 versus 1591 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Environ 72% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 735 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 47 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 | 1591 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 7 February 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 108 | 517 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $375 | |
Prix maintenant | $319.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 47 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 3,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 145 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |