NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1815 MHz
- 3.5x plus de pipelines: 10752 versus 3072
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 48 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 versus 117339
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 versus 337.794
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 59.432 versus 31.631
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2347.314 versus 1654.321
- 8916.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17833 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 versus 23 July 2019 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1815 MHz |
Pipelines | 10752 versus 3072 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 versus 117339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 versus 337.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 versus 31.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 versus 1654.321 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 versus 2 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1650 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- 4.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19606 versus 4237
- 10.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 86
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.996 versus 189.702
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 versus 23142
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 versus 23142
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19606 versus 4237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 versus 189.702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 versus 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 versus 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 19606 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 | 117339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | 337.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | 31.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | 190.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | 1654.321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA102 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 23 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 94 | 109 |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10752 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | |
Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 650 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 48 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |