NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1455 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 625.0 GTexel/s versus 532.8 GTexel/s
- Environ 5% de pipelines plus haut: 10752 versus 10240
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 300 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 48 GB versus 12 GB
- Environ 68% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 versus 714.26
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 189.702 versus 129.036
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s versus 532.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10752 versus 10240 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 12 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 versus 714.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 versus 129.036 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- 6.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 27216 versus 4237
- 12.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1092 versus 86
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 versus 200330
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.192 versus 59.432
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2585.274 versus 2347.314
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 versus 23142
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 versus 23142
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19752 versus 17833
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 5 Oct 2020 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27216 versus 4237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1092 versus 86 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 versus 200330 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 versus 59.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 versus 2347.314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 versus 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 versus 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19752 versus 17833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 27216 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 1092 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 | 209081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | 714.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | 60.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | 129.036 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | 2585.274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 34770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 34770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 19752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA102 | GA102 |
Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 31 May 2021 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | $1199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 93 | 49 |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | 34.10 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10752 | 10240 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 186.5 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | 532.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 750 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 48 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 912.4 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 384 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |