NVIDIA T400 versus NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA T400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 37% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16960 versus 9204
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 versus 46.992
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 versus 535.24
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 versus 2.64
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 versus 44.7
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 versus 141.816
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 versus 4027
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 versus 4027
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 versus 21 February 2019 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16960 versus 9204 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 versus 46.992 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 versus 535.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 versus 2.64 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 versus 44.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 versus 141.816 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 versus 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 versus 4027 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 420 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 30 Watt
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 2173
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 2173
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 420 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 30 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3346 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16960 | 9204 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 46.992 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 535.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 2.64 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 44.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 141.816 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2418 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GP108B |
| Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 | 21 February 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 901 | 902 |
| Genre | Laptop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 420 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 1,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.00 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA T400 avec des autres
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
