NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order versus AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order and AMD Radeon Pro Duo pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 58% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- 22.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65520 versus 53806
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 146.609 versus 141.474
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 3621.344
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 13.132
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 112.973
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 799.933
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 versus 10141
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 versus 10141
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 versus 26 April 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 500 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 versus 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 versus 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 versus 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 versus 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 379.7 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 2x 4096 versus 3840
- Environ 35% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 8,192 gflops versus 12,150 gflops
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 3355
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 3355
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 379.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 versus 3840 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops versus 12,150 gflops |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | 0 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8137 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 745 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | GP102 | Capsaicin |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 | 26 April 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | $1,499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 216 | 188 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Conception | reference | |
Prix maintenant | $849 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 2x 8,192 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2x 4096 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 8,900 million |
Unités de Compute | 128 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 277 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | DirectX® 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | 512 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |