NVIDIA Tesla M60 versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla M60 and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M60
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 925 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 118.4 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2x 2048 versus 2048
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 4,833 gflops versus 3,789 gflops
- 5.3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2x 8 GB versus 3 GB
- 3.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1375 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 versus 84.413
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1451.124 versus 1390.592
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.266 versus 7.336
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2015 versus 22 December 2011 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz versus 925 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 118.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,833 gflops versus 3,789 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2x 8 GB versus 3 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1375 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 versus 84.413 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 versus 1390.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 versus 7.336 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 versus 29262
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 versus 70.038
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 481.76 versus 314.404
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9448 versus 8663
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 886
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 1791
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9448 versus 8663
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 886
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 1791
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 versus 29262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 versus 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 versus 314.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9448 versus 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 1791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9448 versus 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 1791 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M60
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7652 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29262 | 34541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 | 84.413 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 | 1390.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 | 7.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.038 | 101.929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 | 481.76 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8663 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 886 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1791 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8663 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 886 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1791 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla M60 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GM204 | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2015 | 22 December 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 481 | 478 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz | 925 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 557 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,833 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 118.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 274 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2x 8 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 2x 160.4 GB / s | 264 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |