NVIDIA Tesla T4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1392 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 43% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 7008 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10616 versus 5029
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 592 versus 457
- 3.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 17466
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 127.622 versus 67.209
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 799.414
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 4.536
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 versus 30.523
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 223.683
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 7043
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 7043
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 versus 25 October 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1392 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 7008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 versus 5029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 versus 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 versus 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 versus 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 7043 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1290 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 1781
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 1781
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1290 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 1781 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 | 5029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU104 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 | 25 October 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 270 | 586 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Prix maintenant | $124.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 3,300 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,862 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |