Intel HD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 60 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 388 versus 117
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 versus 117 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 57% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.4 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s
- 26.7x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 24
- 3.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- 3.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 1114
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 versus 268
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 4554
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 27.948
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 312.246
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 1.795
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 versus 20.404
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 32.567
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 1859
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 1945
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 1859
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 1945
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 1114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 versus 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 4554 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 27.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 1.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 versus 20.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 32.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 1945 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1216 | 707 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 350M
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5200 Ultra
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9600 TX
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
