Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 388 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
• 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1114
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 268
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 4554
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 27.948
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 312.246
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.795
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 20.404
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 32.567
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 1859
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1945
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 1859
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1114 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4554 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	388 117

Compare specifications (specs)