Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 12.75 GTexel / s
- Environ 51% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 460.8 gflops versus 306.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 19 Watt
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 versus 631
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 versus 208
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 versus 2224
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 4.418
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 142.734
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 0.395
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 versus 8.158
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 versus 17.317
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 895
- 5.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 280
- 6.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 519
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 895
- 5.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 280
- 6.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 519
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 29 September 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 12.75 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops versus 306.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 19 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 versus 631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 versus 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 versus 2224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 4.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 versus 142.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 0.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 versus 8.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 versus 17.317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 versus 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 versus 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 519 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 2224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 4.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 142.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 0.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 8.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 17.317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 519 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 29 September 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 1590 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $49 | |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.44 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 797 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB or 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA |