NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 65% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12712 versus 6967
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 804 versus 626
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62641 versus 36107
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 versus 105.688
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 versus 1083.926
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 versus 8.251
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 versus 79.029
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 versus 520.089
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 9172
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3624
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 9172
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3624
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1278 versus 880
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 18 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 versus 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 versus 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 versus 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 versus 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 versus 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 versus 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 versus 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 versus 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 versus 880 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 157.1 GTexel/s
- Environ 45% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1408
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 157.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1408 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 | 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 | 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 | 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 | 880 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $169 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 223 | 405 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 5,700 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 450 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |