NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1777 MHz versus 1620 MHz
- Environ 56% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2304
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 3% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 175 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 versus 16112
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 versus 819
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 versus 251.703
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 versus 3742.063
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 versus 27.153
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 versus 153.341
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 versus 1569
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 17 October 2018 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz versus 1620 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 2304 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 175 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 versus 16112 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 versus 819 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 versus 88096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 versus 251.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 versus 3742.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 versus 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 versus 153.341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 versus 1569 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1320 MHz
- 7.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 versus 1152.664
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 22495
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 22495
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1320 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 versus 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 16112 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 819 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 88096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 251.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 3742.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 153.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 1304.365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 1569 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA106 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 17 October 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 134 | 151 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 175 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 360 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |