Intel Celeron G4900 vs Intel Pentium G4400
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Celeron G4900 und Intel Pentium G4400 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Celeron G4900
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa {Prozent}% mehr L3 Cache; weitere Daten können im Cache L3 gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.011 vs 1.534
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1013 vs 950
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1013 vs 950
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | January 2018 vs September 2015 |
| L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 4096 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 vs 1.534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1013 vs 950 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1013 vs 950 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Pentium G4400
- Etwa 6% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1980 vs 1840
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2558 vs 2391
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 783 vs 746
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1425 vs 1353
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 43.293 vs 18.62
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.234 vs 0.188
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.391 vs 1.227
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.107 vs 6.512
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2832 vs 1910
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4807 vs 3385
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2832 vs 1910
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4807 vs 3385
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1980 vs 1840 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2558 vs 2391 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 783 vs 746 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1425 vs 1353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 43.293 vs 18.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.234 vs 0.188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.391 vs 1.227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 vs 6.512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2832 vs 1910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4807 vs 3385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2832 vs 1910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4807 vs 3385 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G4900
CPU 2: Intel Pentium G4400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G4900 | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1840 | 1980 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2391 | 2558 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 746 | 783 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1353 | 1425 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 | 1.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.62 | 43.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.188 | 0.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.227 | 1.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.512 | 9.107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1013 | 950 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1910 | 2832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3385 | 4807 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1013 | 950 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1910 | 2832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3385 | 4807 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1610 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Celeron G4900 | Intel Pentium G4400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Coffee Lake | Skylake |
| Startdatum | January 2018 | September 2015 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1955 | 1688 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $58.80 | $69.99 |
| Processor Number | G4900 | G4400 |
| Serie | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 16.38 | 14.96 |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $56 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 4096 KB (shared) |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | 65 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 2 |
| Matrizengröße | 150 mm | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1400 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 37.5 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
| ECC-Speicherunterstützung | ||
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E93 | 0x1902 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.00 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 | Intel® HD Graphics 510 |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1 GHz | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | N / A | |
| Maximale Auflösung über WiDi | 1080p | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 54 Watt | 54 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Celeron G4900 mit anderen
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 400e
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDA8-5500
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelCore i3-4330
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelPentium G4560T
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1400
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelPentium G4400T
