Intel Celeron G4900 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5400
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Celeron G4900 und Intel Pentium Gold G5400 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Celeron G4900
- Etwa 7% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 54 Watt vs 58 Watt
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.011 vs 1.695
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.512 vs 3.324
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1910 vs 1809
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1910 vs 1809
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 54 Watt vs 58 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 vs 1.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.512 vs 3.324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1910 vs 1809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1910 vs 1809 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- 2 Mehr Kanäle: 4 vs 2
- Etwa 19% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2198 vs 1837
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3737 vs 2397
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 912 vs 746
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2007 vs 1353
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 42.899 vs 18.62
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.305 vs 0.188
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.337 vs 1.227
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1108 vs 1013
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1108 vs 1013
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2198 vs 1837 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3737 vs 2397 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 912 vs 746 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2007 vs 1353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.899 vs 18.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.305 vs 0.188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.337 vs 1.227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1108 vs 1013 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3401 vs 3385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1108 vs 1013 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3401 vs 3385 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G4900
CPU 2: Intel Pentium Gold G5400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G4900 | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1837 | 2198 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2397 | 3737 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 746 | 912 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1353 | 2007 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 | 1.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.62 | 42.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.188 | 0.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.227 | 1.337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.512 | 3.324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1013 | 1108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1910 | 1809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3385 | 3401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1013 | 1108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1910 | 1809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3385 | 3401 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Celeron G4900 | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Startdatum | January 2018 | January 2018 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1963 | 1976 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $58.80 | $127.90 |
| Processor Number | G4900 | G5400 |
| Serie | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | Intel® Pentium® Gold Processor Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 16.38 | 12.06 |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 6144 KB (shared) |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 37.5 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E93 | 0x3E90/x93 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 54 Watt | 58 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Celeron G4900 mit anderen
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 400e
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDPhenom II X2 B57
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelPentium G4560T
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1400
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelPentium Gold G5400
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelPentium G4400T
