Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Intel Core i7-3770
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 und Intel Core i7-3770 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Peripherien. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-3770
- Etwa 47% höhere Kerntemperatur: 105°C vs 71.4°C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- Etwa 23% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 77 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Etwa 71% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2074 vs 1216
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 6416 vs 2349
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 798 vs 412
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3074 vs 1299
- 7.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.673 vs 0.612
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 81.095 vs 30.904
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.589 vs 0.175
- Etwa 84% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.318 vs 1.258
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.05 vs 4.476
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C vs 71.4°C |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 77 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2074 vs 1216 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6416 vs 2349 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 798 vs 412 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3074 vs 1299 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.673 vs 0.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 81.095 vs 30.904 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.589 vs 0.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.318 vs 1.258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.05 vs 4.476 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-3770
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 | 2074 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2349 | 6416 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 798 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | 3074 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 1977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | 4.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | 81.095 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | 0.589 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | 2.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 | 6.05 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2876 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2876 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | Intel Core i7-3770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Yorkfield | Ivy Bridge |
| Startdatum | Q1'08 | April 2012 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 3027 | 2019 |
| Processor Number | Q9550 | i7-3770 |
| Serie | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $324 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $159.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.10 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Matrizengröße | 214 mm2 | 160 mm |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 71.4°C | 105°C |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 820 million | 1400 million |
| VID-Spannungsbereich | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 67 °C | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.90 GHz | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | LGA775 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 95 Watt | 77 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
| Thermal Solution | 2011D | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| FSB-Parität | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 1333/1600 | |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x162 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | |
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 mit anderen
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelPentium D 950
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 640
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 631
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1850
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1800
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDA4-4020
