Intel Core i9-8950HK vs Intel Xeon E-2176M
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i9-8950HK und Intel Xeon E-2176M Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i9-8950HK
- Der Prozessor ist entsperrt, ein entsperrter Multiplikator ermöglicht eine einfachere Übertaktung
- Etwa 9% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.80 GHz vs 4.40 GHz
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1117 vs 1088
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 5166 vs 4785
| Spezifikationen | |
| Freigegeben | Freigegeben vs Gesperrt |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.80 GHz vs 4.40 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1117 vs 1088 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5166 vs 4785 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2459 vs 2412
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 10922 vs 10398
- 4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.998 vs 7.809
- 6.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 418.903 vs 65.701
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.172 vs 0.914
- 6.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.52 vs 3.409
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.63 vs 8.455
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2120 vs 1687
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1292 vs 812
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2222 vs 1678
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2120 vs 1687
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1292 vs 812
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2222 vs 1678
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2459 vs 2412 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 10922 vs 10398 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.998 vs 7.809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 418.903 vs 65.701 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.172 vs 0.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.52 vs 3.409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.63 vs 8.455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2120 vs 1687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1292 vs 812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2222 vs 1678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2120 vs 1687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1292 vs 812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2222 vs 1678 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-8950HK
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E-2176M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i9-8950HK | Intel Xeon E-2176M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2412 | 2459 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 10398 | 10922 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1117 | 1088 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5166 | 4785 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 5686 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.809 | 30.998 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 65.701 | 418.903 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.914 | 2.172 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.409 | 23.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.455 | 30.63 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1687 | 2120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 812 | 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1678 | 2222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1687 | 2120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 812 | 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1678 | 2222 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i9-8950HK | Intel Xeon E-2176M | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Startdatum | 3 March 2018 | 1 March 2018 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $583 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1783 | 1013 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $583 | $450 |
| Prozessornummer | i9-8950HK | E-2176M |
| Serie | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i9 Processors | Intel® Xeon® E Processor |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 7.32 | 9.17 |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 2.90 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI | 8 GT/s DMI |
| Matrizengröße | 149 mm | |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.80 GHz | 4.40 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 6 | 6 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 12 | 12 |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 41.8 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E9B | 0x3E9B |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® UHD Graphics P630 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@30Hz | 4096x2304@30Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Gehäusegröße | 42mm x 28mm | 42mm x 28mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1440 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 35 W | |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Speicher unterstützt | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Plattform-Berechtigung | ||
| Speed-Shift-Technologie | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i9-8950HK mit anderen
IntelCore i9-8950HK vs
IntelCore i7-3517UE
IntelCore i9-8950HK vs
IntelCore i7-4610M
IntelCore i9-8950HK vs
IntelCore i3-6100H
IntelCore i9-8950HK vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1500B
