Intel Core i9-8950HK versus Intel Xeon E-2176M
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i9-8950HK et Intel Xeon E-2176M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i9-8950HK
- Processeur est ouvert; un multiplicateur ouvert soutien le overclocking plus facile
- Environ 9% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.80 GHz versus 4.40 GHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1117 versus 1088
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 5166 versus 4785
| Caractéristiques | |
| Ouvert | Ouvert versus barré |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.80 GHz versus 4.40 GHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1117 versus 1088 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5166 versus 4785 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2459 versus 2412
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 10922 versus 10398
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.998 versus 7.809
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 418.903 versus 65.701
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.172 versus 0.914
- 6.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.52 versus 3.409
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.63 versus 8.455
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2120 versus 1687
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1292 versus 812
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2222 versus 1678
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2120 versus 1687
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1292 versus 812
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2222 versus 1678
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2459 versus 2412 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 10922 versus 10398 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.998 versus 7.809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 418.903 versus 65.701 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.172 versus 0.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.52 versus 3.409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.63 versus 8.455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2120 versus 1687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1292 versus 812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2222 versus 1678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2120 versus 1687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1292 versus 812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2222 versus 1678 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-8950HK
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E-2176M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i9-8950HK | Intel Xeon E-2176M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2412 | 2459 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 10398 | 10922 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1117 | 1088 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5166 | 4785 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 5686 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.809 | 30.998 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 65.701 | 418.903 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.914 | 2.172 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.409 | 23.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.455 | 30.63 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1687 | 2120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 812 | 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1678 | 2222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1687 | 2120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 812 | 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1678 | 2222 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i9-8950HK | Intel Xeon E-2176M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Date de sortie | 3 March 2018 | 1 March 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $583 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1783 | 1013 |
| Prix maintenant | $583 | $450 |
| Numéro du processeur | i9-8950HK | E-2176M |
| Série | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i9 Processors | Intel® Xeon® E Processor |
| Statut | Launched | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.32 | 9.17 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Fréquence de base | 2.90 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI | 8 GT/s DMI |
| Taille de dé | 149 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
| Cache L3 | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.80 GHz | 4.40 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 6 | 6 |
| Nombre de fils | 12 | 12 |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 41.8 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E9B | 0x3E9B |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® UHD Graphics P630 |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@30Hz | 4096x2304@30Hz |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Dimensions du boîtier | 42mm x 28mm | 42mm x 28mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1440 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 35 W | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Mémoire Intel® Optane™ prise en charge | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Éligibilité à la plateforme Intel® vPro™ | ||
| Technologie Speed Shift | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i9-8950HK avec des autres
IntelCore i9-8950HK vs
IntelCore i7-3517UE
IntelCore i9-8950HK vs
IntelCore i7-4610M
IntelCore i9-8950HK vs
IntelCore i3-6100H
IntelCore i9-8950HK vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1500B
