AMD FirePro M6100 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD FirePro M6100 und AMD Radeon HD 8790M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FirePro M6100
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 6 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 26% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1075 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 2.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 768 vs 384
- 2.4x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,651 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Etwa 38% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 5500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2195 vs 1306
- 11.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 4679
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 12.759
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 vs 465.631
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 vs 1.576
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 vs 28.839
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 vs 80.418
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 2181
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2517 vs 2014
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 2181
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2517 vs 2014
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 16 October 2013 vs 1 April 2013 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1075 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 51.6 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 768 vs 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,651 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5500 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2195 vs 1306 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 vs 4679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 vs 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 vs 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 vs 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 vs 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 vs 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 vs 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 vs 2014 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 302
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 1803
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 1803
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 vs 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 vs 1803 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M6100 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2195 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 | 4679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 2014 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1607 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD FirePro M6100 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | Saturn | Mars |
Startdatum | 16 October 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 859 | 861 |
Typ | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1075 MHz | 850 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,651 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 768 | 384 |
Texturfüllrate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,080 million | 1,040 million |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 850 MHz | |
Berechnungseinheiten | 6 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop-Größe | large | medium sized |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 88 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
AppAcceleration |