AMD FirePro M6100 versus AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M6100 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M6100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1075 MHz versus 850 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 51.6 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,651 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- Environ 38% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2195 versus 1306
- 10.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 versus 4804
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 versus 12.759
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 versus 465.631
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 versus 1.576
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 versus 28.839
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 versus 80.418
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 versus 2181
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2517 versus 2014
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 versus 2181
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2517 versus 2014
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1075 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.6 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,651 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2195 versus 1306 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 versus 4804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 versus 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 versus 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 versus 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 versus 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 versus 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 versus 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 versus 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 versus 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 versus 2014 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 versus 302
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 versus 1803
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 versus 1803
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 versus 302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 versus 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 versus 1803 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro M6100 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2195 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 | 4804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 2014 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1607 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro M6100 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Saturn | Mars |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 860 | 862 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1075 MHz | 850 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,651 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.6 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 1,040 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 850 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 88 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration |