AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Pro W6600 und AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 7 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 21% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:2200 MHz vs 1825 MHz
- Etwa 29% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 2903 MHz vs 2250 MHz
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 130 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20826 vs 16849
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 3720
- 12.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 3374
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20826 vs 16849
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 3720
- 12.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 3374
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 8 Jun 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 2200 MHz vs 1825 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 2903 MHz vs 2250 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 vs 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 vs 3374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 vs 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 vs 3374 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Etwa 99% höhere Texturfüllrate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
- 2.6x mehr Leitungssysteme: 4608 vs 1792
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 14% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25014 vs 15430
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1021 vs 966
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 152623 vs 72987
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 vs 270.025
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 vs 20.735
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 vs 135.303
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 vs 1054.582
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 4608 vs 1792 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25014 vs 15430 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1021 vs 966 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 152623 vs 72987 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 vs 270.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 vs 20.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 vs 135.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 vs 1054.582 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15430 | 25014 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 966 | 1021 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72987 | 152623 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | 578.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | 52.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | 291.971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | 2700.97 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 3374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 3374 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19444 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Codename | Navi 23 | Navi 21 |
Startdatum | 8 Jun 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $649 | $649 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 66 | 69 |
Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 2903 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 28 | 72 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 2200 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 1792 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 130 Watt | 300 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 11060 million | 26800 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Single-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 300 Watt | 700 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Höhe | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Breite | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 224 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |