AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM und AMD Radeon R9 270X Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- 3.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 50 Watt vs 180 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Etwa 35% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 5.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 84 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 4x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1280 vs 320
- 5.4x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,688 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- 8.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4869 vs 548
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 vs 194
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.87 vs 13.569
- 8.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.72 vs 162.886
- 6.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.354 vs 1.009
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 vs 19.668
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.412 vs 77.819
- 7.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8068 vs 1119
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 1284
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2264
- 7.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8068 vs 1119
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 1284
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2264
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 84 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 vs 320 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,688 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4869 vs 548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 vs 194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 vs 13.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 vs 162.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 vs 1.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 vs 19.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 vs 77.819 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 vs 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 2264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 vs 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 2264 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 548 | 4869 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 613 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 | 63.87 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.886 | 1314.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.009 | 6.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.668 | 85.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 | 315.412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1119 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1284 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2264 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | Oland | Curacao |
Startdatum | 1 November 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1406 | 440 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $199 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $399 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 780 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 730 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 499.2 gflops | 2,688 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 320 | 1280 |
Texturfüllrate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 84 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | 180 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,040 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 168 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 2 x 6-pin |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 28.8 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz | |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |