AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM versus AMD Radeon R9 270X

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 270X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

  • 3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 180 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt versus 180 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 270X

  • Environ 35% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 780 MHz
  • times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 84 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
  • 4x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 320
  • 5.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,688 gflops versus 499.2 gflops
  • 8.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4869 versus 548
  • 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 versus 194
  • 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.87 versus 13.569
  • 8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.72 versus 162.886
  • 6.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.354 versus 1.009
  • 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 versus 19.668
  • 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.412 versus 77.819
  • 7.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8068 versus 1119
  • 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 versus 1284
  • Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 2264
  • 7.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8068 versus 1119
  • 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 versus 1284
  • Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 2264
Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté 1050 MHz versus 780 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture 84 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 versus 320
Performance á point flottant 2,688 gflops versus 499.2 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 4869 versus 548
PassMark - G2D Mark 613 versus 194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 63.87 versus 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1314.72 versus 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.354 versus 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 85.21 versus 19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 315.412 versus 77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8068 versus 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3706 versus 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 versus 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8068 versus 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3706 versus 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 versus 2264

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
548
4869
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
194
613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13.569
63.87
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
162.886
1314.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.009
6.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.668
85.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
77.819
315.412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1119
8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1284
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2264
3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1119
8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1284
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2264
3350
Nom AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM AMD Radeon R9 270X
PassMark - G3D Mark 548 4869
PassMark - G2D Mark 194 613
Geekbench - OpenCL 4936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.569 63.87
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 162.886 1314.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.009 6.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.668 85.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 77.819 315.412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1119 8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1284 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2264 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1119 8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1284 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2264 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1772

Comparer les caractéristiques

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM AMD Radeon R9 270X

Essentiel

Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN 1.0
Nom de code Oland Curacao
Date de sortie 1 November 2013 8 October 2013
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1406 440
Genre Desktop Desktop
Conception AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Prix de sortie (MSRP) $199
Prix maintenant $399
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) 16.05

Infos techniques

Vitesse augmenté 780 MHz 1050 MHz
Vitesse du noyau 730 MHz
Performance á point flottant 499.2 gflops 2,688 gflops
Processus de fabrication 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 1280
Taux de remplissage de la texture 15.6 GTexel / s 84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 180 Watt
Compte de transistor 1,040 million 2,800 million
Stream Processors 1280

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur 168 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires None 2 x 6-pin
Soutien de bus PCIe 3.0

Soutien API

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Mémoire

RAM maximale 2 GB 2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire 28.8 GB / s 179.2 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire 128 Bit 256 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire 1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire DDR3 GDDR5
Mémoire partagé 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)