AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R5 Graphics und AMD Radeon R4 Graphics Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 90% höhere Texturfüllrate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 256 vs 128
- Etwa 90% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 388.1 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.331 vs 4.721
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 107.613
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 vs 0.445
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 vs 10.612
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 13.097
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 701
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 1338
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1811
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 701
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 1338
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1811
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2016 vs 11 June 2014 |
Texturfüllrate | 12.13 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 256 vs 128 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 388.1 gflops vs 204.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 vs 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 vs 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 vs 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 vs 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 vs 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 vs 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 vs 1811 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 4x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 800 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 2981
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 800 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 vs 2981 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 8386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1811 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 342 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 99 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Codename | Wani | Beema |
Startdatum | 31 May 2016 | 11 June 2014 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1551 | 1540 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 800 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 200 MHz | 800 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 388.1 gflops | 204.8 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 256 | 128 |
Texturfüllrate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,410 million | 930 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | IGP | IGP |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertyp | System Shared | System Shared |