AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 256 vs 128
- Around 90% better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.331 vs 4.721
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 107.613
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 vs 0.445
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 vs 10.612
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 13.097
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 701
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 1338
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1811
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 701
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 1338
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1811
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 11 June 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops vs 204.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 vs 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 vs 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 vs 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 vs 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 vs 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 vs 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 vs 1811 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 4x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 2981
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 vs 2981 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 8386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1811 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 342 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 99 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Wani | Beema |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 11 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1551 | 1540 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops | 204.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 930 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |