AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 90% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.13 GTexel / s versus 6.4 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 256 versus 128
- Environ 90% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 388.1 gflops versus 204.8 gflops
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.331 versus 4.721
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 versus 107.613
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 versus 0.445
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 versus 10.612
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 13.097
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 versus 701
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 versus 1338
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 versus 1811
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 701
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 versus 1338
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 versus 1811
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 11 June 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s versus 6.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 versus 128 |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops versus 204.8 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 versus 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 versus 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 versus 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 versus 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 versus 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 versus 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 versus 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 versus 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 versus 1811 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 versus 2981
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 versus 2981 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 8386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1811 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 342 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 99 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Wani | Beema |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 11 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1551 | 1540 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 800 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | 204.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 128 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 930 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | System Shared |