AMD Radeon R6 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R7 M265
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R6 Graphics und AMD Radeon R7 M265 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 616 vs 536
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 137 vs 134
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1784 vs 1264
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3182 vs 2424
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1784 vs 1264
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3182 vs 2424
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 17 September 2014 vs 20 May 2014 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 616 vs 536 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 137 vs 134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1784 vs 1264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3182 vs 2424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1784 vs 1264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3182 vs 2424 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 M265
- Etwa 69% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:900 MHz vs 533 MHz
- Etwa 38% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 825 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Etwa 26% höhere Texturfüllrate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 15.72 GTexel / s
- Etwa 26% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 633.6 gflops vs 503.0 gflops
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 4083
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.031 vs 11.201
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 282.111 vs 224.132
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.455 vs 0.942
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.704 vs 19.267
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 68.392 vs 45.165
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 860
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 860
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 900 MHz vs 533 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 825 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 19.8 GTexel / s vs 15.72 GTexel / s |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 633.6 gflops vs 503.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 vs 4083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.031 vs 11.201 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 vs 224.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 vs 0.942 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 vs 19.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.392 vs 45.165 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 vs 860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 vs 860 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M265
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 616 | 536 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 137 | 134 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4083 | 5587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.201 | 12.031 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 224.132 | 282.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.942 | 1.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.267 | 21.704 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 45.165 | 68.392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 860 | 1551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1784 | 1264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3182 | 2424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 860 | 1551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1784 | 1264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3182 | 2424 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Codename | Spectre | Topaz |
| Startdatum | 17 September 2014 | 20 May 2014 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1403 | 1404 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 600 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 533 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 503.0 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 384 |
| Texturfüllrate | 15.72 GTexel / s | 19.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,410 million | 3,100 million |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 6 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Speicher |
||
| Speichertyp | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 32 GB/s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||

