AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R7 Graphics und NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 33% höhere Texturfüllrate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 4x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 96
- 2.2x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 526.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- 2.2x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 8.7x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 2612
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 6.901
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 vs 146.913
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 vs 0.587
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 vs 10.121
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 22.755
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1047
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2035
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 31 May 2016 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Texturfüllrate | 16.46 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 96 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 526.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 vs 2612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 vs 6.901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 vs 146.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 vs 0.587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 vs 10.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 vs 22.755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2035 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- 3.9x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Etwa 24% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 938 MHz vs 758 MHz
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 vs 2101
- 31.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 vs 33.5
- 75.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 vs 33.9
- 33.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2035 vs 60
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 775 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 938 MHz vs 758 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 vs 2101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 vs 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 vs 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2035 vs 60 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 2612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 6.901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 146.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 0.587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 10.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 22.755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 2035 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 450 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Codename | Wani | GF117 |
| Startdatum | 31 May 2016 | 1 April 2013 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1435 | 1438 |
| Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 758 MHz | 938 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 200 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 526.8 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 96 |
| Texturfüllrate | 16.46 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,410 million | 585 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1-Kanal HD-Audio auf HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Unterstützung | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| eDP 1.2 Signalunterstützung | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| HDCP-Inhaltsschutz | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Unterstützung von LVDS-Signalen | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD und DTS-HD Audio Bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog Display-Unterstützung | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Speicher |
||
| Speichertyp | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1600 MHz | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
| Standard-Speicherkonfiguration | DDR3 | |
Technologien |
||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||

