AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 16.46 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 526.8 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 8.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 2612
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 versus 6.901
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 versus 146.913
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 versus 0.587
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 versus 10.121
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 versus 22.755
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 versus 1047
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2035
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 1 April 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 2612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 versus 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 versus 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 versus 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 versus 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 versus 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 versus 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2035 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- 3.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 938 MHz versus 758 MHz
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 versus 2101
- 31.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 versus 33.5
- 75.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 versus 33.9
- 33.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2035 versus 60
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 938 MHz versus 758 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 versus 2101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 versus 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 versus 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2035 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 2612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 2035 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 450 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Wani | GF117 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1435 | 1438 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | 938 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |